$ AI PriceCompare
← All API prices
§ API model comparison

DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Kimi K3 API pricing

Two Chinese-lab models that compete on value. DeepSeek V4-Pro is the cheaper API by a wide margin; Kimi K3 is a higher-tier open-weights agentic model (now Moonshot's previous-generation flagship) with constant pricing.

Updated November 2, 2026
§ Short answer

The short answer

DeepSeek V4-Pro is about 4.5× cheaper on input and 7.5× on output than Kimi K3 off-peak, and still cheaper at peak. Kimi K3 sits a tier higher (Moonshot's previous-generation flagship, behind K3.1 Pro), has open weights, and doesn't vary its price by time of day.

§ Side by side

Prices and specs

DeepSeek V4-ProKimi K3
ProviderDeepSeekMoonshot AI
TierMid-tierFlagship
Input / 1M tokens$0.66$3.00
Output / 1M tokens$1.98$15.00
Cache hit / 1M$0.022$0.30
Cache write / 1M—$3.00
Context window1M1M
NotesA planned Sep 14, 2026 reroute to V4.1-Flash rates was reversed after user pushback; billing unchanged since the Aug 13, 2026 GA build. Off-peak rate shown; peak (01:00-04:00 & 06:00-10:00 UTC weekdays) is 2x: $1.32/$3.96Previous-generation flagship, superseded by Kimi K3.1 Pro but still sold; open weights; cache write $3 (5-min TTL) or $6 (1-h TTL)

DeepSeek V4-Pro is 4.5× cheaper on input tokens ($0.66 vs $3.00 per 1M). DeepSeek V4-Pro is 7.6× cheaper on output tokens ($1.98 vs $15.00 per 1M).

§ Cost examples

Same workload, both models

WorkloadDeepSeek V4-ProKimi K3Difference
Support chatbot
10,000 conversations × (2,000 input + 400 output tokens)
$21.12$120DeepSeek V4-Pro saves $98.88
Document Q&A
1,000 questions × (30,000 input + 800 output tokens)
$21.38$102DeepSeek V4-Pro saves $80.62
Coding agent session
4M input tokens (90% cache hits) + 150,000 output tokens
$0.64$4.53DeepSeek V4-Pro saves $3.89

Standard rates per 1M tokens from data on this site. The coding-agent row assumes 90% of input is read from the prompt cache (full input price where a model has no cache rate). Cache-write fees, batch discounts and long-context surcharges listed in the notes are not included. Updated November 2, 2026.

§ Verdict

Which one should you use?

Choose DeepSeek V4-Pro if…

you want the lowest API price for text work and can shift bulk jobs outside DeepSeek's weekday peak window.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

you want a higher-tier agentic model with open weights, a constant hourly price, and batch inference at 60% of standard.

Peak-hour pricing versus batch pricing

DeepSeek's discount lever is time: rates double from 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC on weekdays, so off-peak scheduling is the cheap path. Moonshot's lever is batch: kimi-k3 batch inference is 60% of standard price. Even batched, Kimi K3 costs more than off-peak V4-Pro.

Caching

V4-Pro's cache hit is $0.022 off-peak; Kimi K3's is $0.30, and Moonshot also bills cache writes separately by TTL (5 minutes or 1 hour). For agents that resend a long context, V4-Pro's cached tokens are an order of magnitude cheaper.

Tier and portability

Kimi K3 is a former flagship (Moonshot now leads with K3.1 Pro) and V4-Pro is mid-tier, so run your own evals before assuming they're interchangeable. Kimi K3's open weights let you move it off Moonshot's API later. Both offer about 1M tokens of context; DeepSeek lists V4-Pro as text-only with up to 384K output tokens.

§ FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4-Pro or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek V4-Pro, at both off-peak and peak rates. Kimi K3's batch rate (60% of standard) still doesn't reach V4-Pro's off-peak price.

Does Kimi K3 have peak-hour pricing?

No time-of-day pricing is listed for Kimi K3. DeepSeek V4-Pro doubles its rates during weekday peak hours.

Is Kimi K3 open weights?

Yes, Kimi K3 is an open-weights model.

§ Keep reading

Related guides.

How we choose: prices come from each vendor's official pricing page and are re-checked every week. We take no affiliate fees, so rankings aren't for sale.