$ AI PriceCompare
← All API prices
§ API model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1 API pricing

Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's most powerful listed model and Opus 5.5 is its leading Opus, listed at Fable 5.1-level performance for less. On fresh tokens Fable costs 2.5× more; on cached input the two are almost level.

Updated November 2, 2026
§ Short answer

The short answer

Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper on input and output, but cache hits are close: $0.20 vs $0.25 per 1M. That means the output rate — $20.00 vs $50.00 — is what you are really paying for with Fable.

§ Side by side

Prices and specs

Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
TierFlagshipFlagship
Input / 1M tokens$4.00$10.00
Output / 1M tokens$20.00$50.00
Cache hit / 1M$0.20$0.25
Cache write / 1M$5.00$12.50
Context window1M1M
NotesNew leading Opus model (Sep 22, 2026); Fable 5.1-level performance at 20% less than Opus 5; included on Pro/Max/Team at no extra costMost powerful; released Sep 1, 2026, replacing Fable 5 at same per-token price (cache reads cut 75% to $0.25)

Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper on input tokens ($4.00 vs $10.00 per 1M). Claude Opus 5.5 is 2.5× cheaper on output tokens ($20.00 vs $50.00 per 1M).

§ Cost examples

Same workload, both models

WorkloadClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Difference
Support chatbot
10,000 conversations × (2,000 input + 400 output tokens)
$160$400Claude Opus 5.5 saves $240
Document Q&A
1,000 questions × (30,000 input + 800 output tokens)
$136$340Claude Opus 5.5 saves $204
Coding agent session
4M input tokens (90% cache hits) + 150,000 output tokens
$5.32$12.40Claude Opus 5.5 saves $7.08

Standard rates per 1M tokens from data on this site. The coding-agent row assumes 90% of input is read from the prompt cache (full input price where a model has no cache rate). Cache-write fees, batch discounts and long-context surcharges listed in the notes are not included. Updated November 2, 2026.

§ Verdict

Which one should you use?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

you want flagship-level results at the lower price — it is listed at Fable 5.1-level performance and costs 2.5× less on every fresh token.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if…

you have measured a quality gain on your own hardest tasks that is worth 2.5× the output price, or your workload is dominated by cache reads where Fable's premium shrinks.

Why cached workloads narrow the gap

Anthropic prices Fable 5.1 cache hits at 2.5% of base input and Opus 5.5 at 5%, so despite Fable's higher base rate, the cache-hit prices are $0.25 and $0.20. An agent that resends a 500K-token context on every turn pays nearly the same for that context on either model. Cache writes are still 2.5× apart ($12.50 vs $5.00), and output stays 2.5× apart.

Routing between them

Since both share the API, a 1M-token context and standard-rate long-context pricing, a practical setup is Opus 5.5 by default with Fable 5.1 reserved for tasks that fail on Opus — for example, a final review pass. Keep the escalation rate low: at 2.5× output, sending 20% of output tokens to Fable raises the blended output rate by about 30%.

Version history

Fable 5.1 replaced Fable 5 on Sep 1, 2026 at the same per-token price, with cache reads cut 75%. Opus 5.5 followed on Sep 22, 2026. Both get Anthropic's 50% Batch API discount.

§ FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How much more does Claude Fable 5.1 cost than Opus 5.5?

2.5× on input and output: $10.00/$50.00 versus $4.00/$20.00 per 1M tokens. Cache hits are much closer: $0.25 vs $0.20.

Is Opus 5.5 as good as Fable 5.1?

Opus 5.5 is listed at Fable 5.1-level performance. Test both on your own tasks — the right answer depends on your workload.

Do both support 1M-token prompts at standard price?

Yes. Anthropic bills the full 1M context at standard rates on both models.

§ Keep reading

Related guides.

How we choose: prices come from each vendor's official pricing page and are re-checked every week. We take no affiliate fees, so rankings aren't for sale.