$ AI PriceCompare
← All API prices
§ API model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash API pricing

OpenAI's and Google's mid-tier models each have a pricing condition to plan around: a long-context band for GPT-6.1 Sol, and an intro rate for Gemini 3.8 Flash that ends December 31, 2026.

Updated November 2, 2026
§ Short answer

The short answer

Gemini 3.8 Flash is about 2.7× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on standard prompts through December 31. From January 1 Flash's price doubles, cutting that to about 1.3×. On prompts above 272K tokens, Sol's rate rises and Flash's doesn't, so long-context work keeps a bigger gap.

§ Side by side

Prices and specs

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 Flash
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
TierMid-tierMid-tier
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.75
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$3.75
Cache hit / 1M$0.10$0.075
Cache write / 1M$2.50—
Context window1M1M
NotesNew (Sep 29, 2026 DevDay), below Astra in the GPT-6 family; replaces GPT-6 Sol at the same input/output price with a 50% cheaper cache-read rate; >272K tokens: $4/$15, cache $0.20. ChatGPT Work/Codex on Plus/Pro/Business/Enterprise/Edu, plus APIOn the Gemini API free and paid tiers; Gemini 3.7 Flash retired Oct 8, 2026 and now auto-routes here (requests still billed at this rate); intro price thru Dec 31, reverts to $1.50/$7.50 (cache $0.15) Jan 1

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 2.7× cheaper on input tokens ($0.75 vs $2.00 per 1M). Gemini 3.8 Flash is 2.7× cheaper on output tokens ($3.75 vs $10.00 per 1M).

§ Cost examples

Same workload, both models

WorkloadGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 FlashDifference
Support chatbot
10,000 conversations × (2,000 input + 400 output tokens)
$80.00$30.00Gemini 3.8 Flash saves $50.00
Document Q&A
1,000 questions × (30,000 input + 800 output tokens)
$68.00$25.50Gemini 3.8 Flash saves $42.50
Coding agent session
4M input tokens (90% cache hits) + 150,000 output tokens
$2.66$1.13Gemini 3.8 Flash saves $1.53

Standard rates per 1M tokens from data on this site. The coding-agent row assumes 90% of input is read from the prompt cache (full input price where a model has no cache rate). Cache-write fees, batch discounts and long-context surcharges listed in the notes are not included. Updated November 2, 2026.

§ Verdict

Which one should you use?

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if…

you're on OpenAI's platform, your prompts stay under 272K tokens, and you can use the half-price Flex or Batch tiers or OpenAI's long-lived caches.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

you want the cheaper per-token rate, send long prompts, or want a free API tier for prototyping.

How both conditions interact

Sol's requests over 272K tokens cost 2× input and 1.5× output. Flash's whole window is one price, but that price doubles on January 1, 2027. After January, a 100K-token prompt is about 1.3× cheaper on Flash; a 400K-token prompt is about 2× to 2.7× cheaper, depending on the input/output mix.

Cache economics

Sol charges $2.50 per 1M tokens to write a 30-minute cache (a 12-hour cache costs more) and $0.10 to read it — half GPT-6 Sol's old cache-read rate. Flash's cache hit is $0.075 through December, with an hourly storage charge for cached content. Long-lived caches on Sol avoid storage fees but pay a higher write.

Discounts

OpenAI's Batch and Flex tiers halve Sol's price; Google's Batch API halves Flash's. Google also lists a free tier for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Note that Gemini 3.7 Flash was retired on October 8, 2026 and now routes to 3.8 Flash at 3.8 Flash's rate.

§ FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Yes: $0.75 vs $2.00 input and $3.75 vs $10.00 output per 1M tokens through December 31, 2026. It stays cheaper after its January 1 price increase, by a smaller margin.

Does GPT-6.1 Sol charge more for long prompts?

Yes, requests over 272K tokens are billed at a higher input, output and cache-hit rate.

What replaced GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol, released at OpenAI DevDay on September 29, 2026, at the same input and output price with a 50% cheaper cache-read rate.

§ Keep reading

Related guides.

How we choose: prices come from each vendor's official pricing page and are re-checked every week. We take no affiliate fees, so rankings aren't for sale.